Mexico · Politics
Key Facts
—Who is Ricardo Salinas Pliego? A Mexican billionaire and owner of Grupo Salinas, a conglomerate with banking, retail, and media interests across Latin America.
—What is Black Cube? An Israeli corporate-intelligence firm staffed by former Mossad operatives, hired here to gather information on an opposing party.
—What did the UK court rule? On 21 July 2026, the Court of Appeal lifted a global asset-freezing order against Vladimir Sklarov, citing abuse of process.
—What was the secret recording? Black Cube agents allegedly recorded a City lawyer during a dinner, and the material was used to support the litigation.
—Can the fraud claim continue? Yes. The court allowed Salinas Pliego’s underlying US$400 million fraud lawsuit to proceed to trial.
Salinas Pliego, the Mexican billionaire whose Grupo Salinas empire spans banking, retail, and television, suffered a sharp legal setback in London on Tuesday after a UK appeals court found his litigation team relied on a secretly recorded conversation obtained by Israeli intelligence firm Black Cube.
Ricardo Salinas Pliego controls Grupo Salinas, a conglomerate spanning retail, media, and financial services in Mexico.
One-stop reference
Company Intelligence
Every listed company in Latin America — financials, ownership and structure for 1,450+ companies across 26 exchanges, in one place.
RTAsk Rio TimesCost of living, safety, visas across Latin America›
The Billionaire and the Alleged US$400 Million Fraud
Ricardo Salinas Pliego is one of Mexico’s richest men, controlling Grupo Salinas, a sprawling conglomerate that includes Banco Azteca, Elektra retail stores, and TV Azteca. He brought a civil fraud claim in England and Wales against Vladimir Sklarov, a financier he accuses of orchestrating a scheme that stole roughly US$400 million to US$415 million.
The dispute centres on a complex financing arrangement involving shares and assets. Salinas Pliego alleges that Sklarov and entities linked to Astor Asset Management defrauded him, prompting him to seek emergency relief from the English courts, including a worldwide freezing order over Sklarov’s assets.
How Black Cube Entered the Courtroom
Black Cube is a private Israeli intelligence agency founded by former Mossad officers. In 2024, a company controlled by Salinas Pliego hired the firm for approximately £1.14 million (US$1.45 million) plus bonuses to gather information about Sklarov.
According to the appellate judgment, Black Cube agents secretly recorded a lawyer for the opposing side during an alcohol-fuelled dinner. The resulting material was then deployed to support Salinas Pliego’s litigation strategy in the London proceedings.
The Court of Appeal Ruling Against Salinas Pliego
On 21 July 2026, the UK Court of Appeal ruled that the covert-recording tactic constituted a “serious abuse of the process of the court.” The judges stated that such behaviour had “no place in litigation in the courts of England and Wales.”
As a direct consequence, the court lifted the worldwide asset-freezing order against Sklarov. The judges determined that the freeze would not have been maintained had the misconduct been known at the time it was originally granted.
Background: A High-Stakes Cross-Border Dispute
The London proceedings are part of a longer-running commercial battle that has been active since at least 2025. The English High Court had previously dealt with procedural issues tied to Black Cube’s conduct, including strike-out and summary-judgment applications, before the matter escalated to the Court of Appeal.
For foreign investors and expats following Latin American business, the case highlights how disputes involving regional tycoons increasingly spill into English courts. London remains a preferred venue for complex international fraud claims because of its experienced judiciary and powerful freezing-order remedies.
Sklarov was arrested in Chicago earlier in 2026 and remains in jail, according to reports. The UK ruling removes a major financial constraint on him while the broader commercial dispute continues to move through the English courts.
What the Ruling Means for Expats and Investors
The decision is a reminder that English courts impose strict standards on how evidence is gathered, even in hard-fought commercial cases. For expatriates and international investors with ties to Latin America, the case underscores that procedural misconduct can derail powerful legal tools like asset freezes, regardless of the underlying claim’s size.
The ruling does not clear Sklarov of wrongdoing, nor does it end Salinas Pliego’s pursuit of his money. It simply means the billionaire must now fight the fraud claim on its merits, without the extraordinary advantage of having his opponent’s global assets frozen ahead of trial.
What Happens Next in the Legal Fight
The appeals court did not dismiss Salinas Pliego’s underlying fraud claim. The lawsuit, which accuses Sklarov and Astor Asset Management of stealing hundreds of millions of dollars, can still proceed to a full trial.
For now, the spotlight shifts back to the core fraud allegations. Both sides will likely prepare for a trial that examines the complex financing deal at the heart of the dispute, while the controversy over Black Cube’s methods serves as a cautionary tale about the limits of aggressive litigation tactics.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is Ricardo Salinas Pliego?
He is a Mexican billionaire who controls Grupo Salinas, a major Latin American conglomerate with holdings in banking, retail, and media. His businesses include Banco Azteca, a bank popular with lower-income Mexicans, and TV Azteca, one of the country’s largest television broadcasters.
Why did the UK court lift the asset freeze?
The Court of Appeal ruled that using a conversation secretly recorded by Black Cube was an abuse of process, invalidating the basis for the worldwide freezing order. The judges said the freeze would not have been maintained if the covert recording had been disclosed when the order was first granted.
Is the fraud lawsuit against Vladimir Sklarov over?
No. The court explicitly allowed Salinas Pliego’s underlying claim of a US$400 million fraud to continue toward trial. The ruling only removed the asset-freezing order, not the lawsuit itself.