Chinese scientists find some Yangtze flood controls may do more harm than good

By compressing rivers and stripping away natural defences, human engineering may be worsening flood impacts, prompting a global rethink

But a new study has uncovered a paradox: some human interventions may have inadvertently worsened the very flood risks they were built to mitigate.

“We show that flood frequency peaked during the Little Ice Age [1500−1850] … and that human interventions, particularly embankments and lake reclamation, amplified climate-driven flood magnitudes,” a group of scientists in China and Europe wrote in a paper published on Monday in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

They found that while climate remains the primary driver of flood occurrence, human interventions on the Yangtze River actually intensified climate-induced flood risks, rather than mitigating them.

Their analysis showed that constructing embankments and lake enclosures for agricultural use amplified the magnitude of 100-year floods, which have a 1 per cent chance of happening in any year, by 18 and 8 per cent respectively.