Agency packed with Trump appointees looks to bypass federal regulations to speed up construction of his DC arch

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

An independent federal agency packed with Donald Trump appointees has been looking to bypass long-standing federal regulations to speed up construction of the president’s Triumphal Arch in Washington, D.C.

The 250-foot arch would sit at the end of the Arlington Memorial Bridge, across from the Lincoln Memorial. The massive granite structure would be topped with a golden winged figure flanked by two gilded eagles.

Trump has been attempting to leave his mark on D.C. before his second term ends through several rushed projects, including an expensive White House ballroom and a renovation of the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool that turned green from algae shortly after it was complete.

The president hopes to finish his arch in a few short years, and The Atlantic reported Sunday that the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation might make changes to a requirement known as Section 106 to do it.

The preservation council will consider a vote to revise the rules governing Section 106, according to a July 17 email and draft amendments obtained by the publication.

“If adopted, the proposal would give federal agencies broader discretion over preservation reviews, prioritize mitigation over avoiding harm to historic places, and scale back long-standing expectations that officials consider alternative designs or locations before moving forward with building projects,” The Atlantic’s Janay Kingsberry writes.

In the Friday email, Travis Voyles, the vice chair of the council, instructed members to vote on the proposed changes by this Friday. At least seven of the 24 members were appointed by Trump.

A White House official told The Atlantic that the Trump administration “has and will follow all legal requirements in constructing the Triumphal Arch.”

The latest of Trump’s passion projects, the 250-foot arch would sit at the end of the Arlington Memorial Bridge and reportedly cost an estimated $100 million (AFP via Getty Images)

The Independent has reached out to the White House and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation for comment.

If given the green light to break ground, there will be 20-hour workdays to build Trump’s arch over two to three years, CBS News reported last month, citing federal documents.

The arch is also expected to cost a pretty penny, with an estimated $100 million price tag, according to an Axios report from November.

Earlier this month, the National Capital Planning Commission, chaired by Trump appointee William Scharf, voted to advance the president’s arch project, The Washington Post reported at the time.

Fifty-two percent of Americans voiced opposition to the arch, compared with 21 percent who favored it in a poll (Getty Images)

The vote brings Trump one step closer to building his arch, even as he rejects the need for congressional approval.

“We don’t need anything from Congress,” the president told reporters in May.

Three Vietnam War veterans sued Trump in February to stop the arch’s construction, claiming the president did not seek proper approval for it.

Meanwhile, 52 percent of Americans voiced opposition to the arch, compared with 21 percent who favored it in a Washington Post/ABC News/Ispsos poll from April.